Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carole Douglis's avatar

Hi Andrew,

Thank you for your insightful, fact-based posts. It's essential to see where we are and where today's trends are heading.

Your readers may also appreciate knowing that it doesn't have to be that way! That people have researched how Nature managed CO2 (beyond the obvious and necessary tree-planting and regenerative ag). And there are a few processes we know how to emulate that have MASSIVE CDR potential--enough to restore near-pre-industrial CO2 levels by 2050. At a cost that's laughably trivial. (Thousands of times cheaper than much-touted CDR and other carbon tech.)

I invite you to check out ClimateRestoration.substack.com . And the foundational book: Climate Restoration—The Only Future That Will Sustain the Human Race.

Thank you for your great work. And I'd love to talk with you about adding climate restoration as an antidote to the climate despair that comes with all the bad news.

Expand full comment
cliff Krolick's avatar

We're all entitled to our beliefs. There are many questions that scientists remain baffled about.

I'm just offering research 1st noticed by Hans Neu in the early 1960's. , Hans Neu, from senior research scientist and oceanographer with Canadian department of fisheries and Oceans at the Bedford Institute in Nova Scotia. He was most prolific for his data collecting and research regarding manmade impacts onto freshwater, freshwater estuaries, and Northern oceans in the upper latitudes.

Hans understood that the majority of fresh water on this planet is located in the subarctic regions and he was concerned about the construction of huge dams impounding sea-sized reservoirs covering thousands of square miles. He made some significant discoveries soon after he was contracted 1963 by Hydro Quebec to study the environmental impacts of building huge dams on some of the major rivers. He was thorough in collecting water temperatures along the Continental Shelf before and after dam operations began. His readings, taken at specific locations, over some years, were consistently troubling. He provided this information to HQ which found his work to be disturbing. Hans told them that these preliminary findings were showing very poor outcomes onto rivers, marine life, ocean currents, and climate, HQ stopped funding the research, ended his contract, and threatened his career if he published his work in any scientific journal.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts