Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Carroll's avatar

Howarth and McKibben are spot on. We have much better solutions. This is the business of fossil fuels trying to twist the nose of leadership, again. Save money while saving the planet and blow them and their unsupportable hogwash excuses to delay their demise. Do your homework, and it is obvious. The administration sees it now. Moving on... all the way now to faster ROI and smart power. Free from the sun in short order. Please don’t buy into this pitch to more unsustainable atmospheric and oceanic harm.

Expand full comment
Just Dean's avatar

Here's what I think.

1. I think pausing is the right thing to do.

2. I think that there is enough information out there to make a decision and that Congress should demand that DOE give them a recommendation in 1 to 2 months.

3. I think the answer depends on how much coal the LNG displaces, https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/howarth-natural-gas. If I understand Zeke's analysis correctly, basically LNG beats coal regardless of assumed reasonable leaks rates for methane in terms of long term warming potential or forcing function.

4. Believing that we are going to drive global coal use to zero in 15 years is not realistic. We will be lucky to drive coal to zero in the U.S. in 15 years.

5. I don't think Howarth and McKibben should be driving the bus.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts