Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jed's avatar

I really love this article because it helps us see our cumulative emissions as an object, or as a hyperobject as Tim Morton would call it. However, I want to drill down on this phrase "Human CO2 Emissions." Both humans and ancient, fully-decomposed biomass are elements in an assemblage (a system, a process, or a machine) that unburies carbon, sets it on fire, and deposits it into the atmosphere. Humans are animals -- we have bodies that need to eat and sleep and shit, but emitting CO2 is not one of our human needs, not one of our body's needs. We were human for a long time before we started emitting Co2. And therefore, we can continue to be human when we stop. This is important to me because the denialist movement has forced us/liberals to closely identify Co2 emissions with humanity -- as if "to be human is to emit/pollute" -- anthropogenic climate change. It's not really anthropogenic, its industronic: emitted by industry, which is mediated and modulated by a thing we call The Economy. That thing, The Economy, can be re-shaped by governments who are corrupt to a greater or lesser degree (right now, greater, perhaps in the future, lesser).

Expand full comment
Steve Dondley's avatar

Should say 750 billion tons for land use, not 750 tons.

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts